
Hello & welcome to today's Grammar Lesson. I am Jenny, but you may call me Ms. Grammar Nazi. I am here to give you 5 tips regard to great (& proper) writing for your blog. Take notes. There will be a test (Well, not really, but take notes anyway :D)!
- Do not try to write above your actual capabilities.
It's fabulous if you know how to use words like ominous, flabbergasted, bellicose, pugnacious, or antidisestablishmentarianism. But if you're just throwing around big words without really knowing what they mean, you will sound less serious than you're trying to be. Stick with words you know. No one is going to fault you for writing with simple English but there are definitely those of us out there who will notice that you're not making sense. The same goes for complicated sentence structure (like trying to stitch up those dangling participles but doing it wrong). - Remember the rule of thumb where "so-and-so and I" & "so-and-so and me" are concerned.
I think a lot of people see it as more sophisticated to always say "so-and-so and I" but it's not always correct. The rule of thumb is if you can remove "so-and-so" and the sentence still sounds correct, that's the way to go.
Example: "Mary & I went to the ball game." Remove Mary and "I went to the ball game" still sounds right. But if you have "The book was given to Mary and I" and you remove Mary you get "The book was given to I." Doesn't sound right, does it? "The book was given to Mary and ME." It's not unsophisticated. It's correct.
PS: It's NEVER "me and so-and-so." NEVER. - Quotation marks.
First, when using them in a sentence, you use double quotes with the punctuation at the end INSIDE the ending double quotes. "I did something new today." "What hamburger?" Second, when quoting inside a quote you use a single quote NOT a double inside a double.
Correct: "I thought I heard him say, 'What was that?'"
Incorrect: "She told me that Roger said "I am wrong."" - Would of, could of, should of.
NO, SHOULD NOT HAVE. The proper usage is would've, could've, should've. It's a conjunction of would+have. The definition of "of" is "Expressing the relationship between a part and a whole: 'the sleeve of his coat.'" "Would" is not a part or a whole , it's a verb, so there is no proper reason to use the word "of" next to it when what you want to say is you would have done something. I know it SOUNDS like "would of" but it just isn't. - No net/text speak.
EVER. Using the letter "u" instead of the word "you" is just not acceptible. The same with "2" instead of "to" "two" or "too." And "4" instead of "for" and so on, and so forth. Abbreviations are fine in text messages but not on your blog or as part of your social media presence.

Love this list. My spelling is awful (I'm working on it!), but I completely agree on the importance of grammer! It' makes everything so much easier to read.
ReplyDeleteAs long as you're aware & you are working on it, no one can fault you!
DeleteFrom a fellow grammar Nazi here, I love this post! The 'should of' really ticks me off. Also the mixing of their, they're, and there. Oh, and I've been seeing lots of posts with 'bare with me' lately. Um, are we getting naked together??? How about no...
ReplyDeleteI forgot about the their, they're, there thing. I actually haven't seen it in a while but that one bugs me too. Your & you're is another annoying one in the same vein. Glad to know I'm not the only Grammar Nazi in the blogosphere!
DeleteNooo, no naked... :D
Its and it's is my pet peeve. As well as a lot, no alot. We can be a grammar Nazi threesome. And, no, not in the "bare" sense ;-)
DeleteI love this post and I agree with everything but #5. I wouldn't use text speak in a blog post but I use it on twitter from time to time when I am running out of characters!
ReplyDeleteWhat drives me crazy more than anything is improper comma usage and improper semicolon usage. I see it in blog posts and I see it in published novels. That drives me CRAZY.
Oh yeah, I've been known to skimp on letters for tweets but I have always seen Twitter as a mass texting service so I think that's absolutely fine there. Just not in a blog post. I've seen that & it makes me nuts.
DeleteI hear you. The other day I saw a sentence like the following published in a book. "There were a lot of things we could do together; walk, talk, eat hamburgers and read." I wanted to punch the copy editor.
Aghhhhh! That's awful! NO. NO NOOOOO. LOL.
DeleteGreat tips! I usually don't do that normally, but sometimes on Twitter I have to do that to avoid having to use two tweets for a message. But other than that, on Twitter, I always spell things out right and the long way, instead of abbreviating, except for a few special cases. I'm just weird that way. o.O And thanks for the "me" and "I" tip. My teachers are always like "You don't say 'You and me' you say 'You and I'" but I always thought sometimes it sounded weird and now that's why! :)
ReplyDeleteGrammar is not my strong suit, but I never say 'u' I type the whole word and I try not to get my quotations wrong
ReplyDeleteI rarely use text-speak even in texts... :P
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I'm a grammar nazi myself, so I totally relate!
Definitely agree about the text speak-I cringe when people use "u" instead of "you" online. It's acceptable although not ideal in texts.
ReplyDeleteLove the tips! I'm sure I'm guilty of doing a couple of these things though - well, definitely not #5
ReplyDeleteTanya
Girlxoxo.com